|
SUMMARY OF THE 2004 W.F.A.S. ALLOTMENT SURVEY OF WIRRAL |
|
Total number of plots |
953 plots |
|
Number vacant |
278 vacant plots |
29 % vacant |
Number on waiting list |
66 on the waiting list |
|
Number of Animal plots |
15 |
1.5 % of total |
Number vacant |
3 |
|
Total no. of plotholders |
631 |
66 % |
Number of concessions |
112 |
18 % of plot holders |
no. retired |
109 |
96 % of concessions |
no. sick |
2 |
1.5 % of concessions |
no. unemp |
3 |
2.5 % of concessions |
|
|
|
No. of women plotholders |
108 |
17.5 % of plotholders |
No. of new plotholders in
the last year |
48 |
8 % of plotholders |
Number of ½ plots |
66 |
11% of tenants |
|
|
|
Is there an Allotment Society |
|
70.5 % of sites have a society |
No. of Society members |
261 |
42.5% of tenants |
How long has there been a Society (years) |
|
12 years average 60 years (Greasby)
to 0 years |
How many Site secretaries are there on site |
|
|
are they members of the Society |
|
77% are members of the Society |
No. of standpipes on site |
|
5.5 per site average |
Water pressure |
|
100% ok or above |
water
meter on site? |
|
|
stop-tap on site? |
|
|
|
|
|
Boundary fence condition |
|
29.5% poor 29.5 % ok 41 % good |
new
fencing or repair needed? |
|
35% need major repair 65% don't need major repair |
localised new fencing needed ? |
|
35% need local repair |
alternative barrier needed |
|
47% would like to use alternative barriers |
|
|
|
Is there a specific local security problem on your
site |
|
|
How many gates are there to the site
? |
|
2 average |
are
they in good condition ? |
|
77.5% of gates are in good condition |
are they locked |
|
76.5 % of gates are always locked |
Do they adequately prevent unauthorised
access when locked ? |
|
50% of gates do not prevent access when locked |
other security measures installed |
|
12 % have other security measures lights and anti
vandal paint |
|
|
|
incidents of vandalism/theft that have been reported this year ? |
43 acts of vandalism |
2.5 acts of vandalism per site on average with the
most, 9 being at |
Have these all been reported to the Police ? |
|
28 % not reported |
Have these all been reported to the Council ? |
|
79 % reported to the council |
Does the Society record all incidents
? |
|
82% of sites have no records of incidents |
Is the main entrance area |
|
|
Welcoming and well signed |
29.5 % |
|
Off-putting |
35 % |
64.5% are off-putting or ramshackle |
Ramshackle |
29.5 % |
|
Does it have a notice board advertising events etc. ? |
|
47% have notice boards |
|
|
|
Are there disabled facilities on your site ? |
0% |
|
are
these used ? |
|
|
|
|
|
local
groups/associations using your site Schools etc. ? |
18 % have outside groups using the site |
including brownies and local primary schools |
|
|
|
Roadway and footpath condition |
|
|
good |
|
41% have poor condition pathways |
ok |
|
|
poor |
|
|
Is resurfacing or patching needed? |
|
65 % need resurfacing work |
|
|
|
Are vacant plots maintained |
|
|
if so
who by ? |
|
1 site has vacant plots rotavated
or strimmed by the council prior to letting |
if so
how often ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Are vacant plots advertised for rent |
|
23.5 % of sites advertise vacancies locally |
if so
how ? |
|
|
Are grass verges etc.. regularly maintained ? |
|
18 % of sites have council maintenance (one
monthly!) 23.5% of sites have plotholder
maintenance 41.5% of sites have no maintenance |
if so
who by ? |
|
|
if so
how often ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of flush toilets |
1 site has a flush toilet |
|
Number of Portaloos |
1 site has a portaloo |
|
Are they working |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of skips allocated per year is |
|
0.8 per year per site on average 6 sites don't get
skips |
Are more skips needed? |
|
47 % of sites need more regular skips/trailors |
Are skips advertised in advance ? |
|
53% of sites do not advertise skips in advance |
|
|
|
Number of car-parking spaces is |
101 |
average of 6 parking places per site |
Is there a communal building/shop? |
|
23.5% of sites have a community building |
If so, is it Society owned? |
|
all society owned |
Is there a notice board |
|
94 % have a notice board within the site |
If so is it well used |
|
53 % are well used |
Is there a container/storage facility? |
|
76.5 % of sites have no storage facilities |
If so, is it Society owned? |
|
|
Is there power on site? |
1 site has electricity |
|
Is there a communal composting compound on site? |
1 site has communal composting |
|
Are there any other communal facilities? |
1 site has a communal bonfire area and a wood chip
scheme, 1 a central manure dump free to plotholders
and 1 a community area and summerhouse |
|
Does the Society offer |
|
|
tool hire |
|
23% of societies offer tool hire |
secure tool storage |
|
15% of societies offer secure storage |
Seed purchase |
|
53 % of societies offer seed purchase |
Social events |
|
39 % of societies have social events |
Other |
|
|
Is the Society part of a local horticultural/garden
society? |
|
12 % are members of other local societies |
If yes, how many members DO NOT have plots? |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Society affiliated to: Wirral
Federation? |
|
57 % are affiliated to Wirral
Federation |
NSALG? |
|
57 % are affiliated to NSALG |
other
bodies? |
|
15 % are affiliated to other bodies |
|
|
|
Does the Society hold an Annual General Meeting of
members? |
|
31% of societies don't hold an AGM |
elect
a Committee? |
|
31% do not elect a committee |
If yes, how many members? |
|
average comittee is 7 |
does
the Committee meet regularly? |
|
46 % meet regularly |
about
how often? |
|
|
Does the Society have a Constitution? |
|
31 % do not have a constitution |
or a
set of Rules? |
|
|
|
|
|
Has the Society received any grants in the past
four years? |
2 societies have recieved
a total of £6500 in grants |
|
If so, for how much? |
|
|
and
from what body? |
from the Community Chest and Agenda 21 |
|
Does the Society produce a newsletter
? |
|
23% of
societies produce a news letter |
if so
how often ? |
|
|
Over the last Year Do you think your site has |
|
|
improved |
41 % of sites thoght it
had improved in the lst year |
|
no change |
41 % of sites thought they had stayed the same |
|
got worse |
18 % thought their site had got worse |
poor security and lack of site maintenance |